I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really want to locate a bullet while in the 160 class that my older rifle likes.

They may have performed identically for me. Like everyone else I rushed to obtain the more recent SC version but have now switched back again. Preferably you desire about 100% loading density. In case you have ample situation ability for your H4831(prolonged) that you are almost certainly superior off.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo provides .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps from a 26" barrel. I exploit this very same powder in my 300wm shooting 180gr products, so It really is pleasant to possess one particular powder for both of those.

Warning making use of SC or SSC made loads with extended Minimize, back again off and operate up. Use Safe and sound loading approaches.

some cartridges are likely copper foul more than Other individuals while, despite how easy the end is within the bore and call for cleaning in the copper fouling far more typically.

Did you ever try out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with conventional chamber. Pondering What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

Any person loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the effects, any data you are able to share? Must also mention I've some ELD-X 175's I want to take a look at out, if you have data on that likewise.

The SC or SSC specified powders Commonly allow for larger load density, in order to ordinarily get a little bit more powder inside a presented scenario when applying compressed loads. Use of a drop tube can more raise this gain.

WA I'd personally suggest a slower burner that may give improved case density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you happen to be loading heavies extensive.

You could have to produce a few extra posts to obtain cleared to perform PM's. Once you get to that standing I might post inside the labeled reloading section to find out if everyone is in your area for h4831 vs h4831sc a trade. Click to grow...

I have experienced comparable practical experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not shoot very well with something other than Fed215's. Some factors just don't Engage in perfectly with other. Seems like you've selected 3 fantastic powders, I'd personally anticipate at the least one of these to shoot.

I exploit fifty two grs H4831sc with a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It's exact, moderate mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it absolutely h4831 vs h4831sc was me, I might start off at 52 gr and perform up.

arkansas or ohio i never recognized a distinction in addition to the typical is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.

I sawed a person in half to determine how thick the jackets h4831sc load data have been, plus they ended up quickly 2 times as thick to be a fifty-grain hollow point was. Ditto for the 64-grain Energy Level, as these bullets are developed for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know every thing I learn about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know something in any respect in regards to the 223. I doubt that you are going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to understand how it goes.